msg systems
34 Employer Review(s)
Colleagues:
Supervisor:
Tasks:
Salary:
Career:
OVERALL:
Location
#
Country
Date
Rating
Review
Chemnitz 1
18.03.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Reasonable job provider.
Frankfurt 2
29.07.2014
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Recommendable workplace.
Ismaning 3
05.08.2012
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Good Management. Excellent activity. High payments. Beneficial career. Excellent employer.
Ismaning 4
03.10.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent work atmosphere. Good Management. Interesting tasks. Good future prospects. Recommendable workplace.
Ismaning 5
30.03.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Need to improve personnel management. Acceptable service. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Ismaning 6
19.02.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Impeccable Leadership. Excellent activity. First class salary. Best career opportunities. Excellent employer.
Ismaning 7
07.01.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Useful management. Acceptable service. Demotivating income. Rickety ladder of success. Employers with criticisms.
Ismaning 8
20.09.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Good Management. Interesting tasks. High payments. Beneficial career. Excellent employer.
Ismaning 9
28.02.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Satisfactory staff work. Interesting tasks. Recommendable workplace.
Ismaning 10
24.04.2008
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Useful management. Filling employment. Below-average salary. Average recognition. Satisfactory employment site.
Ismaning 11
23.03.2008
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Problematic management style. Acceptable service. Below-average salary. Average recognition. Reasonable job provider.
Ismaning 12
01.03.2009
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Good Management. Acceptable service. Demotivating income. Good future prospects. Reasonable job provider.
Ismaning 13
30.03.2009
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Problematic management style. Acceptable service. Demotivating income. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Ismaning 14
22.05.2009
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Not recommendable employer.
Ismaning 15
26.11.2009
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Satisfactory staff work. Acceptable service. Below-average salary. Average recognition. Reasonable job provider.
Ismaning 16
24.02.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Need to improve personnel management. Filling employment. Demotivating income. Rickety ladder of success. Reasonable job provider.
Germany 17
14.09.2021
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 18
22.01.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Recommendable workplace.
Germany 19
27.07.2018
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 20
06.10.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 21
07.02.2017
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 22
12.02.2018
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 23
14.09.2021
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 24
09.01.2012
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Excellent activity. High payments. Recommendable workplace.
Germany 25
13.11.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Recommendable workplace.
Germany 26
07.12.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Recommendable workplace.
Cologne 27
23.08.2012
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Munich 28
29.10.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Munich 29
01.02.2017
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Problematic management style. Mere Work carried out. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Munich 30
01.02.2017
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Not recommendable employer.
Munich 31
26.10.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Need to improve personnel management. Acceptable service. Below-average salary. Rickety ladder of success. Employers with criticisms.
Passau 32
26.11.2017
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Not recommendable employer.
Passau 33
16.11.2012
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Good Management. Filling employment. Demotivating income. Beneficial career. Recommendable workplace.
Passau 34
28.01.2023
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Recommendable workplace.
